The Wistar Institute Proteomics Facility

Dr. Doug Reilly

🇪🇸 Spain

9.3

Reviewed: September 14, 2023

• - Project Management
• - 10 weeks July - September 2023
• - Biotech Company

Project management was seamless, and the team exceeded our expectations. They handled all aspects of the project with professionalism and efficiency, keeping us informed every step of the way.

Alan Carroll

🇧🇷 Brazil

9.1

Reviewed: August 11, 2023

• - Clinical Data Management
• - 6 weeks June - July 2023
• - CRO

The data management services were delivered on time and with great accuracy. Collaboration with the team was smooth, and they were always available to address any concerns or questions we had. We were very satisfied with the outcome.

Debra Leannon

🇲🇽 Mexico

6

Reviewed: September 12, 2024

• - Health Technology Assessment
• - 8 weeks July - September 2024
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The health technology assessment (HTA) was superficial and did not provide the level of thorough analysis we needed. Some important factors were overlooked, and we had to request additional work to cover these gaps. The overall experience was disappointing.

Steve Littel

🇯🇵 Japan

9.4

Reviewed: November 8, 2023

• - Health Technology Assessment
• - 10 weeks September - November 2023
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The health technology assessment was thorough and provided valuable insights that were critical to our decision-making process. The team demonstrated a deep understanding of the health economics involved and delivered a well-rounded analysis.

Joshua Stanton

🇨🇳 China

5.7

Reviewed: June 10, 2024

• - Project Management
• - 12 weeks March - May 2024
• - Biotech Company

Communication from the project management team was poor, with frequent missed deadlines. This caused significant frustration on our end, as we had to repeatedly chase them for updates. The project eventually got back on track, but the delays were problematic.

Dr. Leonard Wiza

🇪🇸 Spain

6.3

Reviewed: November 7, 2024

• - Stability Studies
• - 16 months July 2023 - November 2024
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The stability studies conducted were lacking in detail, and we had to perform additional validation to ensure the results were reliable. This added extra time and cost to the project. The team was responsive to feedback, but the initial work was subpar.

Mr. Jaime Kerluke DVM

🇺🇸 United States

9

Reviewed: June 18, 2023

• - Clinical Protocol Design
• - 6 weeks April - May 2023
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The protocol design provided was comprehensive and very detailed. It laid a strong foundation for our clinical trial, ensuring that all regulatory and ethical considerations were addressed. The attention to detail was impressive.

Rebecca Funk

🇰🇷 South Korea

6.2

Reviewed: March 15, 2024

• - Clinical Protocol Design
• - 10 weeks January - March 2024
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The protocol design process required multiple revisions due to inconsistencies in the deliverables. Although the team was responsive to feedback, the back-and-forth extended the timeline beyond what was originally agreed upon.

Pete Lynch

🇨🇦 Canada

5.6

Reviewed: February 20, 2024

• - Clinical Data Management
• - 8 weeks December 2023 - February 2024
• - Biotech Company

The data management services were delayed, and communication from the team was lacking. It was difficult to get updates, and when the deliverables arrived, they were not as polished as expected. The delays impacted our project timeline significantly.

Gene Altenwerth PhD

🇧🇷 Brazil

8.7

Reviewed: May 22, 2023

• - Patient Recruitment
• - 8 weeks March - April 2023
• - Clinical Research Organization

The patient recruitment strategies were highly effective, and the project was completed within the agreed timeframe. The team was very professional, and their expertise in patient engagement was evident throughout.