The Wistar Institute Proteomics Facility

Cameron Mitchell

🇪🇸 Spain

9

Reviewed: February 4, 2024

• - Biomarker Development
• - 12 weeks October 2023 - January 2024
• - Research Institution

The biomarker development project was managed efficiently, with precise results that met our project objectives. The team's expertise in biomarker research was invaluable, and we were impressed with the quality of the deliverables.

Dr. Thomas Heaney

🇫🇷 France

9

Reviewed: June 9, 2024

• - Process Development
• - 12 weeks March - May 2024
• - Biotech Company

The process development services enhanced our manufacturing efficiency significantly. The team's expertise in process optimization was evident, and they provided valuable insights that improved our production workflow.

Gail Collier

🇪🇸 Spain

9.1

Reviewed: August 11, 2023

• - Clinical Data Management
• - 6 weeks June - July 2023
• - CRO

The data management services were delivered on time and with great accuracy. Collaboration with the team was smooth, and they were always available to address any concerns or questions we had. We were very satisfied with the outcome.

Myra Dooley IV

🇰🇷 South Korea

5.7

Reviewed: June 10, 2024

• - Project Management
• - 12 weeks March - May 2024
• - Biotech Company

Communication from the project management team was poor, with frequent missed deadlines. This caused significant frustration on our end, as we had to repeatedly chase them for updates. The project eventually got back on track, but the delays were problematic.

Kristen Anderson

🇪🇸 Spain

8.9

Reviewed: March 3, 2023

• - Regulatory Submission
• - 6 weeks February 2023
• - Biotech Startup

Our regulatory submission was handled with great care and expertise. The process was seamless, and their knowledge of the regulatory landscape was impressive. The team's support was invaluable, and I would not hesitate to use their services again.

Anna Weber

🇳🇱 Netherlands

9.4

Reviewed: November 8, 2023

• - Health Technology Assessment
• - 10 weeks September - November 2023
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The health technology assessment was thorough and provided valuable insights that were critical to our decision-making process. The team demonstrated a deep understanding of the health economics involved and delivered a well-rounded analysis.

Mona Hoppe

🇨🇦 Canada

8.8

Reviewed: July 5, 2023

• - Biostatistical Design
• - 4 weeks May - June 2023
• - Research Institution

The biostatistical support provided was top-notch, offering clear and actionable insights that were critical to the success of our study. The team was responsive and worked closely with us to ensure the analysis met our specific needs.

Ethel Aufderhar

🇮🇩 Indonesia

6.2

Reviewed: March 15, 2024

• - Clinical Protocol Design
• - 10 weeks January - March 2024
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The protocol design process required multiple revisions due to inconsistencies in the deliverables. Although the team was responsive to feedback, the back-and-forth extended the timeline beyond what was originally agreed upon.

Jeanne Bartell-Schultz

🇨🇭 Switzerland

9.1

Reviewed: April 6, 2024

• - HTA Submission
• - 8 weeks February - March 2024
• - Biotech Company

The HTA submission was comprehensive and well-executed. The team managed the complexities of the submission process expertly, ensuring that all necessary data was included and well-presented.

Gerardo Lindgren

🇨🇦 Canada

6

Reviewed: September 12, 2024

• - Health Technology Assessment
• - 8 weeks July - September 2024
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The health technology assessment (HTA) was superficial and did not provide the level of thorough analysis we needed. Some important factors were overlooked, and we had to request additional work to cover these gaps. The overall experience was disappointing.