QB3

Pearl Denesik

🇺🇸 United States

8.7

Reviewed: May 22, 2023

• - Patient Recruitment
• - 8 weeks March - April 2023
• - Clinical Research Organization

The patient recruitment strategies were highly effective, and the project was completed within the agreed timeframe. The team was very professional, and their expertise in patient engagement was evident throughout.

Wilfred Herman

🇯🇵 Japan

5.8

Reviewed: April 5, 2024

• - Biostatistical Design
• - 6 weeks February - March 2024
• - Research Institution

The biostatistical analysis provided was not as thorough as we had hoped. Some key insights were missed, and we had to engage another provider to get the level of detail we needed. The team seemed overworked and under-resourced.

Jackie Terry

🇺🇸 United States

8.9

Reviewed: March 3, 2023

• - Regulatory Submission
• - 6 weeks February 2023
• - Biotech Startup

Our regulatory submission was handled with great care and expertise. The process was seamless, and their knowledge of the regulatory landscape was impressive. The team's support was invaluable, and I would not hesitate to use their services again.

Nathan Friesen

🇫🇷 France

9.2

Reviewed: August 20, 2024

• - Regulatory Strategy Consulting
• - 4 weeks July - August 2024
• - Biotech Startup

The regulatory strategy consulting services were thorough and provided us with a clear pathway to regulatory approval. The team's deep understanding of the regulatory landscape was invaluable, and their strategic advice was spot on.

Frances Kulas

🇧🇷 Brazil

6.2

Reviewed: March 15, 2024

• - Clinical Protocol Design
• - 10 weeks January - March 2024
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The protocol design process required multiple revisions due to inconsistencies in the deliverables. Although the team was responsive to feedback, the back-and-forth extended the timeline beyond what was originally agreed upon.

Anthony Quigley

🇮🇳 India

5.4

Reviewed: October 3, 2024

• - Process Development
• - 14 weeks June - September 2024
• - Biotech Company

The process development project encountered multiple delays, and communication was inconsistent. We had to extend our project timeline due to the setbacks, and this impacted our overall production schedule. The team was capable but seemed overextended.

Ken Yundt

🇨🇳 China

9.2

Reviewed: February 15, 2023

• - Data Analysis
• - 4 weeks January 2023
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The team provided exceptional data analysis services, and the project was completed well within the timeline. Communication was clear and consistent, which made the whole process smooth. Highly recommended for anyone needing reliable clinical data management.

Tiffany Terry

🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia

6

Reviewed: September 12, 2024

• - Health Technology Assessment
• - 8 weeks July - September 2024
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The health technology assessment (HTA) was superficial and did not provide the level of thorough analysis we needed. Some important factors were overlooked, and we had to request additional work to cover these gaps. The overall experience was disappointing.

Marsha Ziemann

🇨🇭 Switzerland

8.6

Reviewed: October 2, 2023

• - Patient Engagement
• - 8 weeks August - September 2023
• - Clinical Research Organization

The patient engagement strategies implemented were impressive and led to a significant improvement in our recruitment rates. The team's experience in patient-centered approaches was evident and made a real difference.

Lewis Bogisich

🇰🇷 South Korea

9.4

Reviewed: November 8, 2023

• - Health Technology Assessment
• - 10 weeks September - November 2023
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The health technology assessment was thorough and provided valuable insights that were critical to our decision-making process. The team demonstrated a deep understanding of the health economics involved and delivered a well-rounded analysis.