Medana

Arlene Barton

🇮🇳 India

5.8

Reviewed: April 5, 2024

• - Biostatistical Design
• - 6 weeks February - March 2024
• - Research Institution

The biostatistical analysis provided was not as thorough as we had hoped. Some key insights were missed, and we had to engage another provider to get the level of detail we needed. The team seemed overworked and under-resourced.

Alberta MacGyver Jr.

🇲🇽 Mexico

9.4

Reviewed: November 8, 2023

• - Health Technology Assessment
• - 10 weeks September - November 2023
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The health technology assessment was thorough and provided valuable insights that were critical to our decision-making process. The team demonstrated a deep understanding of the health economics involved and delivered a well-rounded analysis.

Mable Collier

🇲🇽 Mexico

9.3

Reviewed: March 12, 2024

• - Market Access Strategy
• - 6 weeks January - February 2024
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The market access analysis provided strategic insights that were crucial to our launch strategy. The team's recommendations were data-driven and actionable, helping us to make informed decisions.

Fred Heaney

🇧🇷 Brazil

5.7

Reviewed: June 10, 2024

• - Project Management
• - 12 weeks March - May 2024
• - Biotech Company

Communication from the project management team was poor, with frequent missed deadlines. This caused significant frustration on our end, as we had to repeatedly chase them for updates. The project eventually got back on track, but the delays were problematic.

Lance Ebert Sr.

🇷🇺 Russia

9.2

Reviewed: August 20, 2024

• - Regulatory Strategy Consulting
• - 4 weeks July - August 2024
• - Biotech Startup

The regulatory strategy consulting services were thorough and provided us with a clear pathway to regulatory approval. The team's deep understanding of the regulatory landscape was invaluable, and their strategic advice was spot on.