8.7
Excellent
376 reviews
- Communication
- 8.8
- Timeliness
- 8.9
- Accuracy
- 7.6
- Staff
- 8.8
- Value
- 8.9
Mr. Alan Schinner
8.7
- - Patient Recruitment
- - 8 weeks March - April 2023
- - Clinical Research Organization
Reviewed:
Highly effective patient recruitment strategies, project completed on time.
The patient recruitment strategies were highly effective, and the project was completed within the agreed timeframe. The team was very professional, and their expertise in patient engagement was evident throughout.
Nellie Stokes
8.9
- - Regulatory Submission
- - 6 weeks February 2023
- - Biotech Startup
Reviewed:
Professional and knowledgeable, seamless regulatory submission process.
Our regulatory submission was handled with great care and expertise. The process was seamless, and their knowledge of the regulatory landscape was impressive. The team's support was invaluable, and I would not hesitate to use their services again.
Ernestine Zboncak
9.2
- - Data Visualization
- - 3 weeks December 2023
- - Pharmaceutical Company
Reviewed:
Highly effective data visualization, easy to interpret and impactful.
The data visualization services were highly effective, making complex data easy to interpret and communicate. The visualizations were impactful and played a crucial role in our stakeholder presentations.
Erma Leffler
9.3
- - Market Access Strategy
- - 6 weeks January - February 2024
- - Pharmaceutical Company
Reviewed:
Strategic market access analysis, insightful recommendations.
The market access analysis provided strategic insights that were crucial to our launch strategy. The team's recommendations were data-driven and actionable, helping us to make informed decisions.
Pauline Effertz
6.5
- - Regulatory Submission
- - 8 weeks May - July 2024
- - Pharmaceutical Company
Reviewed:
Regulatory submission was incomplete, required additional work.
The initial regulatory submission provided was incomplete, requiring additional work to meet the necessary standards. This resulted in unexpected costs and delays. The team corrected the issues, but it should have been right the first time.
Ron Collins
5.4
- - Process Development
- - 14 weeks June - September 2024
- - Biotech Company
Reviewed:
Process development project faced delays, communication issues.
The process development project encountered multiple delays, and communication was inconsistent. We had to extend our project timeline due to the setbacks, and this impacted our overall production schedule. The team was capable but seemed overextended.
Ernestine Bogan MD
6.2
- - Clinical Protocol Design
- - 10 weeks January - March 2024
- - Pharmaceutical Company
Reviewed:
Inconsistent quality of deliverables, frequent revisions needed.
The protocol design process required multiple revisions due to inconsistencies in the deliverables. Although the team was responsive to feedback, the back-and-forth extended the timeline beyond what was originally agreed upon.
Silvia Konopelski
9.1
- - Pharmacovigilance Services
- - Ongoing
- - Pharmaceutical Company
Reviewed:
Highly effective pharmacovigilance services, ensured compliance.
The pharmacovigilance services ensured that our post-market surveillance was compliant and effective. The team was proactive in monitoring and reporting, providing us with peace of mind and ensuring patient safety.
Oliver Paucek
8.9
- - Medical Writing
- - 5 weeks October - November 2023
- - Biotech Company
Reviewed:
Top-quality medical writing, clear and precise documents.
The medical writing services provided were of top quality. The documents were clear, precise, and tailored to meet the specific requirements of our regulatory submissions. The team's expertise was evident throughout the process.
