8.7
Excellent
376 reviews
- Communication
- 8.8
- Timeliness
- 8.9
- Accuracy
- 7.6
- Staff
- 8.8
- Value
- 8.9
Celia Quitzon
8.7
- - Patient Recruitment
- - 8 weeks March - April 2023
- - Clinical Research Organization
Reviewed:
Highly effective patient recruitment strategies, project completed on time.
The patient recruitment strategies were highly effective, and the project was completed within the agreed timeframe. The team was very professional, and their expertise in patient engagement was evident throughout.
Sarah Torphy
9.2
- - Data Analysis
- - 4 weeks January 2023
- - Pharmaceutical Company
Reviewed:
Thorough data analysis, timely delivery, excellent communication throughout.
The team provided exceptional data analysis services, and the project was completed well within the timeline. Communication was clear and consistent, which made the whole process smooth. Highly recommended for anyone needing reliable clinical data management.
Eula Borer
5.6
- - Clinical Data Management
- - 8 weeks December 2023 - February 2024
- - Biotech Company
Reviewed:
Delayed delivery and lack of communication during the project.
The data management services were delayed, and communication from the team was lacking. It was difficult to get updates, and when the deliverables arrived, they were not as polished as expected. The delays impacted our project timeline significantly.
David Rodriguez
5.8
- - Biostatistical Design
- - 6 weeks February - March 2024
- - Research Institution
Reviewed:
Biostatistical analysis lacked depth, missed key insights.
The biostatistical analysis provided was not as thorough as we had hoped. Some key insights were missed, and we had to engage another provider to get the level of detail we needed. The team seemed overworked and under-resourced.
Irvin Daniel
9.1
- - HTA Submission
- - 8 weeks February - March 2024
- - Biotech Company
Reviewed:
Comprehensive and well-executed HTA submission.
The HTA submission was comprehensive and well-executed. The team managed the complexities of the submission process expertly, ensuring that all necessary data was included and well-presented.
Clifford D'Amore-Johnston
6
- - Health Technology Assessment
- - 8 weeks July - September 2024
- - Pharmaceutical Company
Reviewed:
Health technology assessment was superficial, lacked thorough analysis.
The health technology assessment (HTA) was superficial and did not provide the level of thorough analysis we needed. Some important factors were overlooked, and we had to request additional work to cover these gaps. The overall experience was disappointing.
Susan Purdy
8.6
- - Patient Engagement
- - 8 weeks August - September 2023
- - Clinical Research Organization
Reviewed:
Impressive patient engagement strategies, significant improvement in recruitment rates.
The patient engagement strategies implemented were impressive and led to a significant improvement in our recruitment rates. The team's experience in patient-centered approaches was evident and made a real difference.
