BioLamina

Hannah Hegmann

🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia

5.4

Reviewed: October 3, 2024

• - Process Development
• - 14 weeks June - September 2024
• - Biotech Company

The process development project encountered multiple delays, and communication was inconsistent. We had to extend our project timeline due to the setbacks, and this impacted our overall production schedule. The team was capable but seemed overextended.

Nora Considine

🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia

9.1

Reviewed: August 11, 2023

• - Clinical Data Management
• - 6 weeks June - July 2023
• - CRO

The data management services were delivered on time and with great accuracy. Collaboration with the team was smooth, and they were always available to address any concerns or questions we had. We were very satisfied with the outcome.

Andrew Abernathy

🇦🇺 Australia

5.7

Reviewed: June 10, 2024

• - Project Management
• - 12 weeks March - May 2024
• - Biotech Company

Communication from the project management team was poor, with frequent missed deadlines. This caused significant frustration on our end, as we had to repeatedly chase them for updates. The project eventually got back on track, but the delays were problematic.

Angel Ratke

🇦🇺 Australia

8.9

Reviewed: December 1, 2023

• - Medical Writing
• - 5 weeks October - November 2023
• - Biotech Company

The medical writing services provided were of top quality. The documents were clear, precise, and tailored to meet the specific requirements of our regulatory submissions. The team's expertise was evident throughout the process.

Norma Walsh

🇮🇹 Italy

8.9

Reviewed: March 3, 2023

• - Regulatory Submission
• - 6 weeks February 2023
• - Biotech Startup

Our regulatory submission was handled with great care and expertise. The process was seamless, and their knowledge of the regulatory landscape was impressive. The team's support was invaluable, and I would not hesitate to use their services again.

Everett Hoeger

🇰🇷 South Korea

6.2

Reviewed: March 15, 2024

• - Clinical Protocol Design
• - 10 weeks January - March 2024
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The protocol design process required multiple revisions due to inconsistencies in the deliverables. Although the team was responsive to feedback, the back-and-forth extended the timeline beyond what was originally agreed upon.