8.7
Excellent
376 reviews
- Communication
- 8.8
- Timeliness
- 8.9
- Accuracy
- 7.6
- Staff
- 8.8
- Value
- 8.9
Hannah Hegmann
5.4
- - Process Development
- - 14 weeks June - September 2024
- - Biotech Company
Reviewed:
Process development project faced delays, communication issues.
The process development project encountered multiple delays, and communication was inconsistent. We had to extend our project timeline due to the setbacks, and this impacted our overall production schedule. The team was capable but seemed overextended.
Nora Considine
9.1
- - Clinical Data Management
- - 6 weeks June - July 2023
- - CRO
Reviewed:
Timely and accurate data management, great collaboration.
The data management services were delivered on time and with great accuracy. Collaboration with the team was smooth, and they were always available to address any concerns or questions we had. We were very satisfied with the outcome.
Andrew Abernathy
5.7
- - Project Management
- - 12 weeks March - May 2024
- - Biotech Company
Reviewed:
Poor communication and missed deadlines caused frustration.
Communication from the project management team was poor, with frequent missed deadlines. This caused significant frustration on our end, as we had to repeatedly chase them for updates. The project eventually got back on track, but the delays were problematic.
Angel Ratke
8.9
- - Medical Writing
- - 5 weeks October - November 2023
- - Biotech Company
Reviewed:
Top-quality medical writing, clear and precise documents.
The medical writing services provided were of top quality. The documents were clear, precise, and tailored to meet the specific requirements of our regulatory submissions. The team's expertise was evident throughout the process.
Norma Walsh
8.9
- - Regulatory Submission
- - 6 weeks February 2023
- - Biotech Startup
Reviewed:
Professional and knowledgeable, seamless regulatory submission process.
Our regulatory submission was handled with great care and expertise. The process was seamless, and their knowledge of the regulatory landscape was impressive. The team's support was invaluable, and I would not hesitate to use their services again.
Everett Hoeger
6.2
- - Clinical Protocol Design
- - 10 weeks January - March 2024
- - Pharmaceutical Company
Reviewed:
Inconsistent quality of deliverables, frequent revisions needed.
The protocol design process required multiple revisions due to inconsistencies in the deliverables. Although the team was responsive to feedback, the back-and-forth extended the timeline beyond what was originally agreed upon.
