BioLamina

Mr. Doyle Yundt

🇬🇧 United Kingdom

5.4

Reviewed: October 3, 2024

• - Process Development
• - 14 weeks June - September 2024
• - Biotech Company

The process development project encountered multiple delays, and communication was inconsistent. We had to extend our project timeline due to the setbacks, and this impacted our overall production schedule. The team was capable but seemed overextended.

Tabitha Stoltenberg

🇧🇷 Brazil

8.6

Reviewed: October 2, 2023

• - Patient Engagement
• - 8 weeks August - September 2023
• - Clinical Research Organization

The patient engagement strategies implemented were impressive and led to a significant improvement in our recruitment rates. The team's experience in patient-centered approaches was evident and made a real difference.

Mr. Pablo Gleason

🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia

9.1

Reviewed: September 5, 2024

• - Pharmacovigilance Services
• - Ongoing
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The pharmacovigilance services ensured that our post-market surveillance was compliant and effective. The team was proactive in monitoring and reporting, providing us with peace of mind and ensuring patient safety.

Sue Sawayn

🇨🇦 Canada

9.5

Reviewed: April 10, 2023

• - Gene Therapy Development
• - 12 weeks January - March 2023
• - Research Institution

The gene therapy project was managed exceptionally well, with innovative solutions provided at every stage. The team was highly collaborative and receptive to feedback, making it a truly joint effort. The results exceeded expectations.

Natasha Braun

🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia

6.5

Reviewed: July 18, 2024

• - Regulatory Submission
• - 8 weeks May - July 2024
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The initial regulatory submission provided was incomplete, requiring additional work to meet the necessary standards. This resulted in unexpected costs and delays. The team corrected the issues, but it should have been right the first time.

Terry McGlynn

🇪🇸 Spain

9.1

Reviewed: August 11, 2023

• - Clinical Data Management
• - 6 weeks June - July 2023
• - CRO

The data management services were delivered on time and with great accuracy. Collaboration with the team was smooth, and they were always available to address any concerns or questions we had. We were very satisfied with the outcome.

Brittany Cronin

🇲🇽 Mexico

5.7

Reviewed: June 10, 2024

• - Project Management
• - 12 weeks March - May 2024
• - Biotech Company

Communication from the project management team was poor, with frequent missed deadlines. This caused significant frustration on our end, as we had to repeatedly chase them for updates. The project eventually got back on track, but the delays were problematic.

Mr. Leonard Hane

🇩🇪 Germany

6.2

Reviewed: March 15, 2024

• - Clinical Protocol Design
• - 10 weeks January - March 2024
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The protocol design process required multiple revisions due to inconsistencies in the deliverables. Although the team was responsive to feedback, the back-and-forth extended the timeline beyond what was originally agreed upon.