Shelia Abernathy

🇬🇧 United Kingdom

8.6

Reviewed: October 2, 2023

• - Patient Engagement
• - 8 weeks August - September 2023
• - Clinical Research Organization

The patient engagement strategies implemented were impressive and led to a significant improvement in our recruitment rates. The team's experience in patient-centered approaches was evident and made a real difference.

Dr. Frank Waelchi

🇺🇸 United States

9.5

Reviewed: April 10, 2023

• - Gene Therapy Development
• - 12 weeks January - March 2023
• - Research Institution

The gene therapy project was managed exceptionally well, with innovative solutions provided at every stage. The team was highly collaborative and receptive to feedback, making it a truly joint effort. The results exceeded expectations.

Jennie Schultz

🇮🇹 Italy

6.3

Reviewed: November 7, 2024

• - Stability Studies
• - 16 months July 2023 - November 2024
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The stability studies conducted were lacking in detail, and we had to perform additional validation to ensure the results were reliable. This added extra time and cost to the project. The team was responsive to feedback, but the initial work was subpar.

Seth Moore

🇯🇵 Japan

5.6

Reviewed: February 20, 2024

• - Clinical Data Management
• - 8 weeks December 2023 - February 2024
• - Biotech Company

The data management services were delayed, and communication from the team was lacking. It was difficult to get updates, and when the deliverables arrived, they were not as polished as expected. The delays impacted our project timeline significantly.

Ollie Hermann

🇷🇺 Russia

9.2

Reviewed: January 10, 2024

• - Data Visualization
• - 3 weeks December 2023
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The data visualization services were highly effective, making complex data easy to interpret and communicate. The visualizations were impactful and played a crucial role in our stakeholder presentations.

Shelley Fahey

🇪🇸 Spain

8.9

Reviewed: March 3, 2023

• - Regulatory Submission
• - 6 weeks February 2023
• - Biotech Startup

Our regulatory submission was handled with great care and expertise. The process was seamless, and their knowledge of the regulatory landscape was impressive. The team's support was invaluable, and I would not hesitate to use their services again.

Aaron Reinger

🇷🇺 Russia

9.3

Reviewed: September 14, 2023

• - Project Management
• - 10 weeks July - September 2023
• - Biotech Company

Project management was seamless, and the team exceeded our expectations. They handled all aspects of the project with professionalism and efficiency, keeping us informed every step of the way.

Terrance Hickle

🇨🇭 Switzerland

5.7

Reviewed: June 10, 2024

• - Project Management
• - 12 weeks March - May 2024
• - Biotech Company

Communication from the project management team was poor, with frequent missed deadlines. This caused significant frustration on our end, as we had to repeatedly chase them for updates. The project eventually got back on track, but the delays were problematic.

Ms. Sabrina Brakus

🇷🇺 Russia

5.8

Reviewed: April 5, 2024

• - Biostatistical Design
• - 6 weeks February - March 2024
• - Research Institution

The biostatistical analysis provided was not as thorough as we had hoped. Some key insights were missed, and we had to engage another provider to get the level of detail we needed. The team seemed overworked and under-resourced.

Lynn Stamm

🇨🇦 Canada

8.9

Reviewed: December 1, 2023

• - Medical Writing
• - 5 weeks October - November 2023
• - Biotech Company

The medical writing services provided were of top quality. The documents were clear, precise, and tailored to meet the specific requirements of our regulatory submissions. The team's expertise was evident throughout the process.