Seattle Children's Hospital Research Institute - Center for Global Infectious Disease Research

Jim Koepp Jr.

🇬🇧 United Kingdom

8.9

Reviewed: December 1, 2023

• - Medical Writing
• - 5 weeks October - November 2023
• - Biotech Company

The medical writing services provided were of top quality. The documents were clear, precise, and tailored to meet the specific requirements of our regulatory submissions. The team's expertise was evident throughout the process.

Amanda Carter

🇷🇺 Russia

6.2

Reviewed: March 15, 2024

• - Clinical Protocol Design
• - 10 weeks January - March 2024
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The protocol design process required multiple revisions due to inconsistencies in the deliverables. Although the team was responsive to feedback, the back-and-forth extended the timeline beyond what was originally agreed upon.

Willie O'Kon V

🇺🇸 United States

9

Reviewed: February 4, 2024

• - Biomarker Development
• - 12 weeks October 2023 - January 2024
• - Research Institution

The biomarker development project was managed efficiently, with precise results that met our project objectives. The team's expertise in biomarker research was invaluable, and we were impressed with the quality of the deliverables.

Terence Willms

🇳🇱 Netherlands

5.6

Reviewed: February 20, 2024

• - Clinical Data Management
• - 8 weeks December 2023 - February 2024
• - Biotech Company

The data management services were delayed, and communication from the team was lacking. It was difficult to get updates, and when the deliverables arrived, they were not as polished as expected. The delays impacted our project timeline significantly.

Dr. Miranda Kuvalis

🇮🇩 Indonesia

6.3

Reviewed: November 7, 2024

• - Stability Studies
• - 16 months July 2023 - November 2024
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The stability studies conducted were lacking in detail, and we had to perform additional validation to ensure the results were reliable. This added extra time and cost to the project. The team was responsive to feedback, but the initial work was subpar.

Robin Glover

🇮🇩 Indonesia

6

Reviewed: September 12, 2024

• - Health Technology Assessment
• - 8 weeks July - September 2024
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The health technology assessment (HTA) was superficial and did not provide the level of thorough analysis we needed. Some important factors were overlooked, and we had to request additional work to cover these gaps. The overall experience was disappointing.

Kelly Zieme

🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia

9.2

Reviewed: January 10, 2024

• - Data Visualization
• - 3 weeks December 2023
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The data visualization services were highly effective, making complex data easy to interpret and communicate. The visualizations were impactful and played a crucial role in our stakeholder presentations.

Mr. Cory Franey

🇰🇷 South Korea

9.1

Reviewed: September 5, 2024

• - Pharmacovigilance Services
• - Ongoing
• - Pharmaceutical Company

The pharmacovigilance services ensured that our post-market surveillance was compliant and effective. The team was proactive in monitoring and reporting, providing us with peace of mind and ensuring patient safety.

Luke Prosacco

🇪🇸 Spain

8.6

Reviewed: October 2, 2023

• - Patient Engagement
• - 8 weeks August - September 2023
• - Clinical Research Organization

The patient engagement strategies implemented were impressive and led to a significant improvement in our recruitment rates. The team's experience in patient-centered approaches was evident and made a real difference.