RareSearch logo

Seattle Children's Hospital Research Institute - Center for Global Infectious Disease Research

50+ personnel
Headquartered in Chandler
Established in 2025
Website
Orville Johnson profile

Orville Johnson

🇫🇷 France

8.6

    Reviewed:

  • - Patient Engagement
  • - 8 weeks August - September 2023
  • - Clinical Research Organization

Impressive patient engagement strategies, significant improvement in recruitment rates.

The patient engagement strategies implemented were impressive and led to a significant improvement in our recruitment rates. The team's experience in patient-centered approaches was evident and made a real difference.

Angie Morar profile

Angie Morar

🇮🇹 Italy

9.3

    Reviewed:

  • - Market Access Strategy
  • - 6 weeks January - February 2024
  • - Pharmaceutical Company

Strategic market access analysis, insightful recommendations.

The market access analysis provided strategic insights that were crucial to our launch strategy. The team's recommendations were data-driven and actionable, helping us to make informed decisions.

Karla Wolff profile

Karla Wolff

🇮🇩 Indonesia

8.8

    Reviewed:

  • - Biostatistical Design
  • - 4 weeks May - June 2023
  • - Research Institution

Excellent biostatistical support, clear and actionable insights.

The biostatistical support provided was top-notch, offering clear and actionable insights that were critical to the success of our study. The team was responsive and worked closely with us to ensure the analysis met our specific needs.

Tim Predovic profile

Tim Predovic

🇪🇸 Spain

9.2

    Reviewed:

  • - Data Analysis
  • - 4 weeks January 2023
  • - Pharmaceutical Company

Thorough data analysis, timely delivery, excellent communication throughout.

The team provided exceptional data analysis services, and the project was completed well within the timeline. Communication was clear and consistent, which made the whole process smooth. Highly recommended for anyone needing reliable clinical data management.

Marlon Lubowitz profile

Marlon Lubowitz

🇨🇭 Switzerland

9.1

    Reviewed:

  • - HTA Submission
  • - 8 weeks February - March 2024
  • - Biotech Company

Comprehensive and well-executed HTA submission.

The HTA submission was comprehensive and well-executed. The team managed the complexities of the submission process expertly, ensuring that all necessary data was included and well-presented.

Stephanie Dickens profile

Stephanie Dickens

🇮🇹 Italy

9

    Reviewed:

  • - Clinical Protocol Design
  • - 6 weeks April - May 2023
  • - Pharmaceutical Company

Comprehensive protocol design, very detailed and precise.

The protocol design provided was comprehensive and very detailed. It laid a strong foundation for our clinical trial, ensuring that all regulatory and ethical considerations were addressed. The attention to detail was impressive.

Dr. Vicky Dibbert profile

Dr. Vicky Dibbert

🇩🇪 Germany

5.8

    Reviewed:

  • - Biostatistical Design
  • - 6 weeks February - March 2024
  • - Research Institution

Biostatistical analysis lacked depth, missed key insights.

The biostatistical analysis provided was not as thorough as we had hoped. Some key insights were missed, and we had to engage another provider to get the level of detail we needed. The team seemed overworked and under-resourced.

Andre Romaguera profile

Andre Romaguera

🇳🇱 Netherlands

8.8

    Reviewed:

  • - Companion Diagnostics Development
  • - 16 weeks January - May 2024
  • - Pharmaceutical Company

High-quality companion diagnostics development, delivered on time.

The development of companion diagnostics was of high quality, and the project was delivered on time. The team's technical expertise and understanding of the regulatory environment were key to the success of the project.

Dr. Clarence Waters profile

Dr. Clarence Waters

🇰🇷 South Korea

6.3

    Reviewed:

  • - Stability Studies
  • - 16 months July 2023 - November 2024
  • - Pharmaceutical Company

Stability studies lacked detail, required additional validation.

The stability studies conducted were lacking in detail, and we had to perform additional validation to ensure the results were reliable. This added extra time and cost to the project. The team was responsive to feedback, but the initial work was subpar.